Tuesday, May 30, 2006
On the Defensive
With England’s perennial left wing conundrum well and truly solved, the great holding midfielder debate can begin. To begin…should we have one at all? Well, yes quite frankly, for two reasons:
Firstly it solves the problem of the utilisation of Lampard and Gerrard. This is an obvious one; with a holding midfielder they can drive forward, and is the best of a bad situation with the absence of Rooney.
Secondly, if England want to win the World Cup, it is highly arguable that their arch nemeses this time around will be attacking midfielders. Ronaldinho, Messi, Riquelme, Ballack, Zidane, Nedved, Christiano Ronaldo, and Kaka will pose just as much, if not more threat than the obvious candidates up front such as Ronaldo, Torres, Shevchenko, Henry, Van Nistelrooy etc. Thus a spare in front of the back two could be invaluable.
With this in consideration, Hargreaves and Carrick simply don’t have the mettle, and Carragher is our man. With a few stipulations (based on tonight’s performance): Firstly, if he is going to pass the ball backwards and sideways, which is fine, he has to do it quickly, rather than dithering like he did on many occasions tonight. Our midfield four also have to give him early options. We don’t need Carra to run with it, or pick out through balls, just passing it on will do nicely thanks, so do it quickly.
Perhaps more importantly, Carragher will have to concede less fouls. He conceded at least 5 in the first half today, and better teams would have punished this. If the referee today is anything like what we will get in the World Cup, Carragher is the kind of player that will be frequently penalised.
So, Carragher is our man, as long as he releases the ball quicker, and fouls less. He is a world class player, but doesn’t have much class, so lets just hope he does his job.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment